The Secrets of Lucifer

Chapter 3: The Satanic Bloodlines

 

 


The Line of Cain

 

38I speak that which I have seen with my Father: and ye do that which ye have seen with your father. 39They answered and said unto him, Abraham is our father. Jesus saith unto them, If ye were Abraham’s children, ye would do the works of Abraham. 40But now ye seek to kill me, a man that hath told you the truth, which I have heard of God: this did not Abraham. 41Ye do the deeds of your father. Then said they to him, We be not born of fornication; we have one Father, even God. 42Jesus said unto them, If God were your Father, ye would love me: for I proceeded forth and came from God; neither came I of myself, but he sent me. 43Why do ye not understand my speech? even because ye cannot hear my word. 44Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it. 45And because I tell you the truth, ye believe me not. John 8:38-45 (KJV)

In the last few decades, it has been asserted by a growing number of people that the Templars have acted as the protectors of a secret Merovingian bloodline which claims Jesus Christ as its ancestor. Although not far from the truth, it is, in fact, not true, and the “Priory of Sion” is the major disinformation tool of a hoax perpetrated by Gnostic Freemasons. Deceiving themselves, the people who have perpetuated this hoax tend to group all the different Gnostic sects together, not realizing that the Mandaeans were the only group to ever be called Gnostics until the Athanasian Christians literally became ignorant enough that they could not tell the differences between the various groups. Catharism actually has its roots in the anti-Christian doctrines of Manichaeism, and it is Catharism, not one of the many other Gnostic religions, which is practiced by the neo-Gnostic Luciferians. By trading their own Gnostic roots for ignorance and tradition, Christians have turned their religion into one which is openly hostile to both Luciferianism and apostolic or Biblical Christianity. The Bible clearly indicates that the Johannites were originally part of the same Gnostic sect of Essenes, as the first Christians were.

18Dear children, this is the last hour; and as you have heard that the antichrist is coming, even now many antichrists have come. This is how we know it is the last hour. 19They went out from us, but they did not really belong to us. For if they had belonged to us, they would have remained with us; but their going showed that none of them belonged to us. 1 John 2:18-19 (NIV)

In The World At War, we covered how the Templars brought Catharism to France in the 12th century and became the forerunners of the Albigensian heresy. We covered the fact that Albert Pike did not regard Hugh de Payens as the true successor of St. John, thought to be the Evangelist by Freemasons and Christians, and the Baptist by the Luciferians who came into contact with the Johannites. Now we shall take a closer look at the secret teaching which is responsible for Illuminism and the hidden history of the world’s ruling families.

It must first be understood that the secret bloodline which many investigators have been researching is not a bloodline (or any other type of line) of Christ. This is key to understanding everything else, as the Bible painstakingly records Yahshuah’s ancestry in order to establish him as the rightful King of Salem. This is no small matter, for Yahshuah’s younger brother James the Just was established as the presbyter of the Christian community in Jerusalem, and as High Priest of Zerubbabel’s Temple after Yahshuah’s death, and the Naassenes traced the transmission of their pontifical powers through a woman named Miriamne (presumably Mary Magdalene), who was allegedly initiated by James. Assuming this story is true, that the tradition of the Johannites is also valid, and that Hugh de Payens was actually designated by the Johannites as their successor, then the claim of sovereignty over the world’s nations extends through the ancient kings of Israel (not through Yahshuah, but through his brother James the Just), all the way to Melchizedek, to whom Abraham himself did homage. However, it is obviously a false claim, and also begs the question of how a group of people so openly hostile to everything which Biblical Christianity stands for could claim to be its true inheritors and practitioners.

46While Jesus was still talking to the crowd, his mother and brothers stood outside, wanting to speak to him. 47Someone told him, “Your mother and brothers are standing outside, wanting to speak to you.” 48He replied to him, “Who is my mother, and who are my brothers?” 49Pointing to his disciples, he said, “Here are my mother and my brothers. 50For whoever does the will of my Father in heaven is my brother and sister and mother.” Matthew 12:46-50 (NIV)

The notion of a secret Merovingian bloodline is just a cover, a distraction from the truth specifically intended to lure Christians away from the teachings of their institutions and provoke them into a defensive position. Regardless of what came of Yahshuah after the Biblical account, he is recorded therein as having been a Nazarite, and in order to preserve his sanctity he would have had to have been celibate, or else married under law (as opposed to in a sexual union which was unlawful).66 To deny this is to ignore the evidence that he really even existed in the first place, as most of the credible evidence attaches the Nazarite title and customs to his name.67 Even the Luciferian adepts of the Johannites and the Albigenses carried on the tradition of celibacy to the point that a thousand years later, converts to Catharism were expected to leave their spouses.68

The nobility of Europe actually believe they are descended from Satan himself, through Eve, rather than from Adam. (Cain was the firstborn of Eve and his half-brother Abel was the firstborn of Adam.) This has always been the great secret of the Ophite (from the Greek ophis, ‘snake’) sects such as the Naassenes and Sethians, and therefore the Manichaeans as well, all of whom regarded Christ as synonymous with the Serpent of Eden. This association is illogical, however, as Yahshuah himself claimed that the “tares” were Satan’s progeny in the Parable of the Weeds, recorded in Matthew 13:24-30 and explained in 13:36-43. The enmity between Satan’s line and Adam’s line as a fundamental religious theme was also understood by the writer of Genesis, not to mention the compilers of the Dead Sea Scrolls.

15“And I will put enmity between you and the woman, and between your offspring and hers; he will crush your head, and you will strike his heel.” 16To the woman he said, “I will greatly increase your pains in childbearing; with pain you will give birth to children. Your desire will be for your husband, and he will rule over you.” Genesis 3:15-16 (NIV)

This indicates that Eve’s sexual desire was originally for Satan (called Asmodeus in the Babylonian and Rabbinic traditions) and shifted to Adam when she was deprived of her previous lover. It also indicates that the nature of the conflict between good and evil in our world originated in Eve’s union with Satan, and that it has been waged by their descendants ever since. As Cain was a child of the Devil, his offerings were not pleasing to God, therefore he murdered his brother Abel out of jealousy, thereby eliminating the line of Adam.

11This is the message you heard from the beginning: We should love one another. 12Do not be like Cain, who belonged to the evil one and murdered his brother. And why did he murder him? Because his own actions were evil and his brother’s were righteous. 1 John 3:11-12 (NIV)

Despite modern translations, the connotation of this passage actually reads “Cain, who was born of the evil one.” Genesis 5:3 indicates that Adam had another son in his own likeness who he named Seth, and that his righteous line was therefore preserved. The idea of the conflict between the seed of Cain and the seed of Seth dates back to before the verifiable establishment of any of the world’s religions, and was ultimately what caused the falling away of the Hamitic tribes inspired by Lucifer’s exploits.

The Kenites are one of the most ancient sects in existence. Like the Naassenes and Sethians, they derive their name from the fact that they regard themselves as Cain’s offspring. (Canaan also took his name from Cain.) They were the direct predecessors of the Johannites, and were established in all parts of the Roman Empire long before the advent of Christianity. Saul blessed them and David shared his spoils with them. Their frequent associations with the tribe of Judah account for how the latter became the Synagogue of Satan immediately after the Judges period. (Even some of the Judges were married to Kenites.) The tribes of Israel intermarried with the other Canaanites whose Satanic bloodlines were just as pure, and many of the Kenites were known to have settled in the northern regions of Palestine as well.69

It has been hypothesized that the Kenites introduced Moses to the worship of Yahweh, as Moses was a son-in-law of Jethro, a Kenite priest of Midian.70 However, Jethro’s cult worshiped Elohim, a word used to designate ‘the gods’ during the Old Testament period which has become transmuted into monotheistic cultures as the singular and generic title for God. (It is almost certainly a collective transliteration of the Babylonian ellu into Hebrew.) Regardless of their relationship, Moses’ influence was exclusively Egyptian, and therefore the religions of the two men may have had a common origin, but Jethro was a Luciferian and Moses could not have been, as he has been rejected by them and accepted by Yahshuah. Jethro’s influence probably only extended to the priesthood designed by Moses and later usurped by the Satanists.

According to the beliefs of the European nobility, Satan’s blood (that is, his DNA/genes) is inherently powerful, and the purer the blood the more powerful the bloodline. For this reason, certain families in the occult hierarchy occupy a status above what would otherwise be expected, and people who otherwise have much financial and political power marry into these families to attain that occult power.71 This process is similar, or rather, identical to titular families arranging marriages with wealthy bourgeoisie for their mutual benefit. The pattern is noticeable everywhere, and as marriage outside of the bloodlines is forbidden, the most powerful families routinely either marry into each other or inbreed.

 

 

The Line of Ham

 

 The line of Cain was preserved by Noah’s son Ham whose wife was presumably a Kenite, because Ham was not. (Genesis 6:9 says that Noah was “perfect in his generations.”) Noah cursed Ham’s son Canaan for Ham’s transgression, a sexual liaison with his father while the old man was drunk.72 The curse fell upon Canaan because he, unlike Ham, was the seed of Cain. Canaan was the common ancestor of the Philistines, and his name is synonymous with Palestine. This is why the Judaeans were forbidden to cohabitate with the Canaanites prior to their sojourn to Babylon. Although no secular authority claims to know what the name of Canaan means, its meaning is ‘offspring of Cain,’ or Kenite.73 As evidence of this, there is at least one person in the line of Cain who bore the same root name, as recorded in Genesis 4:22.

The name of Ham has been corrupted from its ancient form of Khem.74 Khem means ‘black’ in Egyptian, and Egypt was called Khemet (‘the black land’) by its inhabitants. Due to modern racial sensitivities, this name is interpreted as deriving from the richness of the soil in the Nile region, another lie intended to cover up and mislead. Ham settled there for a specific reason (the reestablishment of Lucifer’s antediluvian kingdom which had been centered there), and the whole world was still recovering from the Flood, which means that the soil was no different there than anywhere else at that time. (The Bible says that ten months passed before the tops of the trees in Ararat were visible.) If not for the color of his skin, we are at a loss to come up with a feasible reason for the fact that Egypt was called Khemet (literally, ‘the land of Ham’) and why Africans coincidentally have significantly darker skin than ethnic Asians and Europeans.

The truth is that if Ham’s wife was a Kenite, then not just blacks, but all of Ham’s sons were also Kenites. There is nothing actually racist about a proper interpretation of the curse of Canaan, as Canaan appears to have been the only son of Ham with light skin, based on the traits of his surviving descendants.75 The curse was made against Canaan simply because he was the only of Ham’s sons born by that time, and therefore the only living male descendant of Satan. This is supported by the fact that Ham was the youngest of Noah’s sons, and the eldest son of Shem was not born until two years after the Flood.

The Canaanites were—simply put—wicked, and their wickedness extended past their proverbial cities of Sodom and Gomorrah. The first Canaanites to build on the ruins of the antediluvian world were the Hattu (Hittites), descendants of Canaan’s son Heth. According to Genesis 27, Isaac’s firstborn Esau lost his birthright because he married Hittite women. Esau therefore became the chief enemy of his brother Jacob, and the neighboring nations of Edom and Israel never resolved their issues. Edom even has an entire book of prophecy against it in the form of Obadiah.

Canaan’s firstborn was Sidon, the ancestor of the Phoenicians whose city of that name was built in the land of the nefilim. Solomon, the founder of the Synagogue of Satan, allied himself with the Sidonians through marriage, an act which secured his fall from grace and the destruction of his kingdom.76 He was also helped in the building of his temple by the Sidonian king, despite the fact that the Sidonians were selling Israelite captives to the Greeks as slaves.77

Sidonian colonists founded Tyre, which became the glory of the seafaring world. Perhaps the most wicked person mentioned by name in the Bible is Jezebel, a Sidonian princess from Tyre who married King Ahab of Israel. Jezebel conspired to kill all but one of the existing prophets of Mt. Carmel and established the prophets of Baal throughout the land in what was the most disastrous situation the Old Testament prophets ever faced. Muttoial ruled over Tyre after the reign of Jezebel’s father expired, and after him the kingdom was passed to the joint rule of his son Pygmalion and daughter Elissar (the great niece of Jezebel). Muttoial’s brother was the high priest of Melqart named Acherbas. He married his niece Elissar but was murdered by Pygmalion. Fearing her brother, Elissar fled from Tyre to North Africa where she founded the city of Carthage in 814 BC. Carthage soon surpassed Tyre and became the greatest city in the world, bringing the cult of Melqart wherever its navigators went.78

Ezekiel prophesied that Tyre would be destroyed and never rebuilt. It was first conquered by Nebuchadnezzar in 573 BC after a siege which lasted 13 years. Alexander the Great laid waste to it when he captured it in 332 BC, decreeing that Melqart was to become known as Apollo Philalexander in his honor. Not content to be the new and living manifestation of the spirit of Lucifer, he also took out his frustration in a matter befitting the Phoenicians’ own god by slaying the entire population. This great sacrifice to Melqart was perhaps the bloodiest in history, prior to the modern era.79

Alexander did far more against Tyre than Shalmaneser or Nebuchadnezzar had done. Not content with crushing her, he took care that she never should revive; for he founded Alexandria as her substitute, and changed forever the track of the commerce of the world. Edward Creasy80

Besides Canaan, Ham’s other sons were Mizraim (‘two tribes,’ in reference to Egypt), Cush and Phut. They were the ancestors of the tribes which settled in Africa and, through Nimrod’s influence, controlled Mesopotamia. The first kingdoms in the world— namely Kush in Upper Egypt and Kish in Sumer—were established either by Cush (as an eponymous founder) or by his immediate descendants. This, combined with the application of Ham’s name to the land of Egypt, strongly implies that the Kenites made a conscious effort to rebuild the cities which had been destroyed in the Flood and impose an autocratic rule similar to the one exercised by Osiris.

The central story of Egyptian mythology—that of Horus, the god of light, avenging his father Osiris against his uncle Set—may be regarded as the continuation of the Luciferian ideology in Egypt and the Osiris cult’s war against the sons of Seth. In the Egyptian mystery religion rites, the initiate is told that Horus was the reincarnation of Osiris, that he is united with Horus, and that he will be reincarnated again, though reincarnation (or transmigration) in this sense is not the same as what is implied by the modern idiom.81 This is the logical basis for the equating of Lucifer and mankind in the Luciferian ideology of Humanism.

To all Egyptians, the ruler of Egypt was the reincarnation of Horus, the second rightful king of Egypt after his father Osiris. His name is attached to all the others as the official regal title or ‘Horus name.’ As Osiris is Lucifer, Horus is probably the Egyptian name of the deified Cush, or his son Nimrod. Nimrod was from Kush in Upper Egypt, and his Akkadian Empire began with the dynasty at Kish. Cush was also the ancestor of the Arabian tribes, which explains why the Midianites, although offspring of Abraham, were also known to be Kenites living in and around Canaan.

 

 

The Line of Gomer

 

 As it has already been shown that all of the Hamitic races were descended from Satan, it is a small step to assert that the Satanic bloodlines run through the white populations of Europe and therefore all other lands inhabited by Europeans as well. It has been asserted in The World At War that the Ashkenazi Jews of Europe in particular were descended from the tribes of Khazars who were descendants of Japheth as well as of Shem. More specifically, they were descended from Japheth’s sons Gomer and Magog, and Ashkenaz himself is listed in Genesis as a son of Gomer. This marriage between the blood of the Diaspora Jews and the powerful tribes of Asshur and Gomer are what give the Jews their claim to the succession of the Luciferian hierarchy as forbearers of the seed and ideology of Satan. The region near the Caucasus whence they came is where Noah’s Ark rested, and where the lines of all three of his sons came together again and spread the seed of Satan throughout the world. This is, of course, an oversimplification of what has really transpired, but such simplicity is necessary for understanding the origins of nations.

Even though Western religious traditions take it for granted that we in the West are all human-ET hybrids, not everyone is cognizant of this fact. As a result, racial bigotry has a long history among Luciferians and Satanists alike. Plato and Aristotle advocated not only infanticide, but also genocidal military campaigns against nations which were not Greek. Spartans acting on Pythagorean ideals left their weak babies outside their cities to die.82 Inbred Roman emperors, on the other hand, are credited with the dissolution of the empire because of their hereditary insanity, evidence to some that selective breeding was necessary and effective.83

Eugenics (‘good breeding’ in Greek) was resumed in the 19th century as a scientific and somewhat pseudo-scientific approach to the Illuminist concept of the gradual and progressive evolution of mankind toward the Luciferian state through the preservation of the highest possible concentration of Satan’s DNA and the elimination of less worthy bloodlines. It was called “the self direction of human evolution” and drew from many sources, organizing them into an all-encompassing Aryan (Turkic/Ashkenazi) philosophy.84 The amalgamation of the areas of science to explain the cultural phenomena of the Enlightenment (which, incidentally, were already becoming antiquated) culminated in the Eurocentric philosophy of Nordicism.

Of the secret societies originally part of the Luciferian conspiracy outside of continental Europe, perhaps none was so important to the development of Illuminism as the Lunar Circle of Birmingham, an extension of the Hellfire Club of Buckinghamshire founded by the Satanist Francis Dashwood, who was in Weishaupt’s inner circle and ranked among the original six identifiable Illuminaten. The Lunar Circle became known as the Lunar Society in 1775, and just like the Hellfire Club, it had a close association with the English Illuminists in America such as Benjamin Franklin and Thomas Jefferson.85 Members of the Lunar Society included Josiah Wedgwood, Samuel Galton and Erasmus Darwin, the progenitors of the pseudo-scientific hypothesis of evolution by means of natural and sexual selection.86 The members of this small club kept their secrets well-hidden by marrying their children together. The most notable of their offspring were the grandson of Wedgwood and Darwin (Charles Robert Darwin) and the grandson of Galton and Darwin (Francis Galton).

The doctrine of Nordicism which became mainstream in the ethnocentric philosophies of Europe was almost entirely the product of the members of the Lunar Society and a few other Illuminists in continental Europe. It was advanced by the French Illuminist Arthur de Gobineau and his Essay on the Inequality of the Human Races (1855), and this set the stage for Charles Darwin’s seminal treatise On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life (1859). Gobineau also visited Bayreuth and influenced the development of Richard Wagner’s Bayreuth Circle, which was critical in the establishment of the racial supremacism ideals by the crypto-Jews in Bavaria and the rest of Germany.87 Inspired by his cousin Darwin’s work, Francis Galton founded the Eugenics Society, now known as the Galton Institute, the purpose of which was and is to advance the ideologies of white supremacy and selective breeding.88 When Galton died, leadership of the Eugenics Society passed to Darwin’s son Leonard, and then again to his grandson Charles Galton Darwin.89

Thomas Huxley published On the Methods and Results of Ethnology in 1865 while evolutionism and eugenics were still fledgling, earning him the nickname ‘Darwin’s Bulldog.’ Huxley’s ideas concerning Darwin’s favored races, which he termed the Xanthochroi, were immediately incorporated into what became known as the concept of an Aryan race by the emerging religion of Theosophy. The ‘Nordic man’ soon replaced the Xanthochroi as the staple of German Idealist propaganda, but those who had developed the idea of their race being favored had always attributed their supremacy to the proto-Indo-Europeans of the Caucasus region as well as the Nordic tribes, and to the secret doctrines of the most ancient of the Luciferians. Reading the Idealist propaganda, one might wonder what the German philosophers would have said had they realized that the ancient Hindus and Egyptians were no less White and racist than they, as the modern research by geneticists and their own writings and artwork clearly portray.

The highest civilization and culture, apart from the ancient Hindus and Egyptians, are found exclusively among the white races; and even with many dark peoples, the ruling caste or race is fairer in colour than the rest and has, therefore, evidently immigrated, for example, the Brahmans, the Incas, and the rulers of the South Sea Islands. All this is due to the fact that necessity is the mother of invention because those tribes that emigrated early to the north, and there gradually became white, had to develop all their intellectual powers and invent and perfect all the arts in their struggle with need, want and misery, which in their many forms were brought about by the climate. This they had to do in order to make up for the parsimony of nature and out of it all came their high civilization. Arthur Schopenhauer90

Eugenics was established as the status quo of anthropological theory before World War One, but was still only advocated by a small group of closely related intellectuals. To increase the amount of Aryan and nationalist propaganda being fed to the masses, Alfred Ploetz founded the German Society for Racial Hygiene in 1905.91 His brother-in-law Ernst Rüdin had been educated at one of the most prestigious Illuminist boarding schools in the world, the Institut auf dem Rosenberg in St. Gallen, Switzerland. Rüdin became a director of Ploetz’s society, as well as the director of the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Genealogy in Munich, the Max Planck Institute for Brain Research in Frankfurt, and the Genealogical-Demographic Department at the German Research Institute of Psychiatry.92 These two men and their associates formed the Expert Committee on Questions of Population and Racial Policy for the Nazi Party, which was responsible for the Nuremberg Race Laws and the ‘Final Solution’ to the Jewish Question.93, 94

Despite the insincere efforts of naturalists to duplicate the anthropological methods established in the Bible, the only thing more detrimental to their cause than the unpopularity of their genocidal ideologies is their own lack of knowledge concerning the historical record. Seventeen centuries before Aryanism found a foothold in Europe, Ptolemy placed the Chomarians (Gomerites) between Media, Bactriana and the Caspian Sea, and his work was recreated in the 15th century.95 Stephen Quayle lists Josephus, St. Isidore, St. Jerome, Eustathius of Antioch and Joseph Goronidis in support of the claim that the Gomerites were none other than the Gauls who spread into Europe.96 The 17th century Breton philologist Paul-Yves Pezron even documented how and why the Gomerites divided, and where they went.

By consulting the most famous ancient geographers, such as Ptolemy, Pliny, Pomponius Mela, and Dionysius of Alexandria, Pezron also learned that after the fall of the tower of Babel Comer’s people settled in Bactriana and Margiana, lands to the southeast of the Caspian Sea. Ptolemy, he notes, divided the Gomarians into two clans. Those called Chomarians he placed in Bactriana, “pretty near the Oxus.” Some old maps of Bactriana that Pezron looked at confirmed this, for on them he found a city called Chomara, which he took to be “the capital of these people.” As for their cousins, called Comarians, Ptolemy located them “towards the most eastern boundaries of Sogdiana, not far from the sources of the Jaxartes, and in the country of the Sacae.” Mela, the earliest Latin geographer, also separated these kindred peoples, but on his map he settled the Comarians toward Sogdiana and Bactriana, while locating the Chomarians a little above the Caspian Sea and toward the Massagetae. Pezron sees no contradiction in this. “‘Tis clear enough from hence,” he says, “that both these people came from the same stock; that at first they were founded by Gomer towards the countries of Margiana and Bactriana, and that in process of time they separated from one another; that one continued in Bactriana, their ancient habitation, and that the other moved towards those countries that lay to the east, beyond the Jaxartes, between the spring of that river and Mount Imaus.” Stephen Quayle97

Due to the failure of the 19th century Nordicists to understand the correlation between Celtic culture and what they called the Alpine race, they associated the genetic traits of the Nordic peoples with those few remaining isolated groups of Celts which had not mixed their bloodlines with the Mediterranean populations. Of course, the Nordic theory was only developing parallel to the work of Gregor Mendel, so they could not have understood the inheritance of genetic traits, and it was not without reason that evidence which later contradicted their theories was dismissed as “Jewish science.” All the way through the Third Reich, it was hypothesized that what are now understood to be the recessive traits of the “Nordic man” were genetically superior to others, and that a Nordic line could “breed out” the dominant traits.

This in no way detracts from the notion that the “Aryan race” was less polluted with what they perceived to be contaminants (non-ET DNA), but insomuch as the Celtic bloodlines of Ireland were just as pure according to their own theory, there is no reason to believe that they were actually from Aryan descent. It was, in fact, the Gauls (descendants of Gomer) who were the Satanic/Aryan super-race, not the Finns and the Slavs (descendants of Gomer’s brother Meshech). As these same people were the Ashkenazis, the Aryan race is none other than the so-called Jewish race. This secret has been guarded by the Synagogue of Satan for many centuries, and it is doubtful that any but the most trusted of the global elites and initiates of certain “anti-Semitic” institutions are privy to it. The Nordic ideal actually comes from the bloodlines of the tribe of Dan through the Danes who became the ethnic masters of Europe.

After the Flood, the Gomerites came to the ancient land of Albania (now Azerbaijan and Dagestan), the original name of which was Aran or, according to the Zend Avesta, Airyana Vaego (‘first land’).98 (This is the origin of the term ‘Aryan.’) Spreading west as well as east, the Gomerites were the ones who settled the British Isles, which they named Albion. Out of the undisturbed Gaelic languages and bloodlines of the Gomerites came Cináed mac Alpín, founder of the House of Alpín and the Kingdom of Alba, so-named during the reigns of his successors.99 The beginnings of this kingdom are interesting, to say the least.

During the conquest of Palestine by the Israelites, the tribe of Dan inherited a small patch of land on the Mediterranean coast at the 33rd latitude and 33rd Parisian longitude, the very spot which the ancient traditions claim Lucifer landed.100 This was Phoenician territory, and it meant that the Danites were plagued by conflict with the much stronger Philistines. The word dan means ‘judge,’ and Dan was set apart from his brothers, having been prophesied to be their judge. The Danite Samson in particular played the most prominent role of any judge in the period of the Israelites’ war against their Philistine oppressors.

Dan is called the “lost tribe” because it is not accounted for in the 144,000 sealed in Revelation chapter 7. This is supposedly (according to Catholic tradition established by Irenaeus) because it fell into idolatry and was declared by the time of Amos as being cut off from its inheritance.101 This hardly would have mattered to them, as their influence extended all the way to Greece where they became the ruling class of Danaans, to Jutland where they became known as the Danir (Danes), and to Ireland where they were known as the Tuatha Dé Danann after conquering and merging their bloodline with the ancient Gauls. The Tuatha were then conquered and assimilated by the Milesians from Spain, the last ethnic group to completely conquer Ireland.102 The colonization of these lands by the tribe of Dan makes sense, considering that their allotment was too small to support a large population, and that they were accused of taking to the customs of the seafaring Phoenicians as early as the judges period.103

According to the book which bears his name, the prophet Jeremiah was selected by God to rule over the nations and kingdoms of the world.104 Jeremiah was the grandfather of King Zedekiah of Judah and the great-grandfather of the Judaean princess Tea Tephi.105 He acted as a counselor to the young king who, the Bible says, was evil, and whose kingdom fell to the Babylonians as a result. Sometime before this, Jeremiah fled to Egypt with the princess and his scribe Simon Baruch. He eventually wound up in Ireland where the Milesian high king honored him and made him the regent of his kingdom.106 He brought with him the Stone of Scoon, which was then used to coronate the kings of the Dál Riata and their Scottish descendants. Tea Tephi was married to the Gallic-Hamitic-Danite prince and future king, thereby uniting all of the noteworthy Satanic bloodlines with the royal house of Judah under Jeremiah’s guidance, and ultimately making possible the rise of the Satanic-Luciferian world government by direct succession from the Synagogue of Satan’s founder King Solomon. To this day the royal family in Britain claims divine right to rule as the supposed heirs of the House of David.

 

 

 

 


 


66
I do not mean to say that a Nazarite necessarily had to be celibate (although that is what the historiographers of the period in question have told us), but rather that it is inconceivable that Yahshuah would have put his sexual desires ahead of his office. When his alleged lover Mary Magdalene approached him after his resurrection, he said, “Do not touch me, for I have not yet returned to the Father.” The idea that Yahshuah and Miriam were lovers is absurd at best, promulgated simply because there was no other woman apart from his mother who is said to have had semi-regular contact with him in the synoptic gospels. The spurious Gospel of Thomas implies that his disciples were jealous of her because of the physical attention he gave her, but even this implies that the disciples were homosexuals. Furthermore, Miriam is supposed to have been the prostitute whose life Yahshuah is known to have saved, but there is no evidence whatsoever to support the unlikely claim. Considering that she was from Capernaum, it is also nearly impossible. This shows that the whole idea of Yahshuah’s only alleged sexual liaison is based on purely mythical Cathar beliefs.

67 ‘Yahshuah of the Nazarenes’ (literally ‘Yahshuah the Nazarite’) is universally rendered as ‘Jesus of Nazareth’ in Christian literature, including the English Bible, even though no such geographical location ever existed. This twisting of the facts through mass ignorance and tedious language barriers rivals the assertion that he was a Jew. To admit that he was a Nazarite (or even a Nazarene) is to admit that he was not a Jew and, in fact, that he was bitterly opposed to all things Jewish/Satanic, therefore both assertions must be made before his name can be properly discredited. This was accomplished with the invention of the Jewish identity and the impact of the Jewish Enlightenment on European Christianity. I do not even claim to know where the name of Nazareth comes from. It seems to be a fabrication out of thin air. I have checked the available Roman records prior to the Jewish War, and it appears they had no record that such a place ever existed, which would make it either the subject of the greatest oversight in the history of Roman geography, or else a post hoc conspiracy to cover up knowledge of its existence. Mandaeans have interpreted his name as ha’Notzri in order to claim him as one of their own. (The Notzriim comprise the highest level of the Mandaean hierarchy.) However, this is not the same word as that used in the Bible. (The vowel placement changes its meaning.) To make matters worse, the name (Essenes) which is applied to the Nazarenes themselves is almost universally taken to apply just as well to the other Gnostic cults in that place and time, and to the Mandaean sects which followed (as discussed in the context of endnote 62). If not for the many examples of Gnostic apostasy available in the Bible, it would be impossible to even tell the difference between the Essenes of the Nazarene (Nazorean, Nasaraean) type and the Essenes of the Naassene (Ossaean, Elkasaite) type, or to provide a context for the schism. The latter were, in a very real way, patterned after the former. Either interpretation of the word ultimately comes from the Egyptian ntr which signifies the various aspects of the divine essence and the Maat (‘truth’) cult built around its origins. The close association between the keepers of the sacred knowledge on both sides of the duality (the Notzriim of the snake cults who claimed succession from the Nazarites, and the Nazarenes/early Christians who succeeded the Nazarites via Yahshuah and his disciples) will probably factor into the false identity created by the Luciferians to present their false mosheh as the prophesied return of “Jesus.” By hiding the truth for many centuries themselves, they hope to use it to their advantage at the most opportune time by blaming Christians (specifically the Roman Catholic Church) for covering it up. Note how all disinformation schemes target Catholicism as the visual figurehead of Christianity and how the only truths which are to be found in them are the attacks on the Church, as opposed to the alternate history or antithetical ideology they provide. This only makes sense within the scope of the Hegelian dialectic, with the recognition that both Athanasianism and Arianism are just interpretations of the truth, created and managed by the same individuals with the same presiding judge (in this case Constantine) and the same synthesis (universalism) in mind. Athanasianism in particular came by way of Mithraism and Manichaeism, which is nothing more or less than a Naassene religion, and its foundation is upon Nicolaism, which is just another word for the Gnosticism of the Naassenes (mentioned in Revelation 2 as the doctrines of Pergamum, the the city which the Romans of the BC era ultimately adopted their religion from). Apostolic Christianity has never even been a part of the equation, and is only represented by the various Gnostic sects which were anathemized by the Roman Catholic Church, even though these same sects originally diverged from it. See endnote 76.

68 “Cathars,” Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cathars.

There was a huge difference between the way the members of the monastic martial orders and their respective Gnostic cults on the European continent practiced their religion. Generally speaking, the Cathars were extremely pious and avoided acts of violence to the point of death. The Templars, on the other hand, regularly murdered for profit, and many did not take their vow of celibacy (according to the Rule of St. Benedict) any more seriously than their vow of poverty. The Knights of Malta even mutinied against their grand master once and imprisoned him for dismissing prostitutes from their ships. By the time of the Albigensian Crusade, the Cathars and the Templars had little in common except their doctrines.

69-70 “Kenite,” Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenite.

71 Fritz Springmeier, Bloodlines of the Illuminati, ch. 3, retrieved from http://www.thewatcherfiles.com/bloodlines/collins.htm.

72 Genesis 9:20-27

73 “Canaan,” Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canaan.

“The name Canaan is of obscure origins, with one possibility being the non-Semitic Hurrian Kinahhu, meaning ‘blue cloth.’” I hope readers of this book understand the fallacy of substituting the name of Cain as the origin of Canaan with “blue cloth” in a language which is not even Semitic, considering Canaan is, according to the same source, “the common ancestor of closely related Semitic languages.” I have included the reference to show that there is no feasible alternative in common use apart from the implicit Biblical account. In truth, the name has extraterrestrial origins, but a discussion of the subject of our extraterrestrial origins in the present context would not be appropriate, given the allotted space and target audience.

74 “Ham, son of Noah,” Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ham%2C_son_of_Noah.

75 Canaan seems to be the common ancestor of the Mediterranean races which were originally descended from his cousins, the children of Shem and Japheth, as were the Nordic and Alpine races. Though all European races are fair-skinned, the lighter phenotype traits of the Mediterranean races came about primarily by the influence of the Sidonians and the tribe of Dan. Compare Homer’s reverence for the light-haired and fair-skinned Achaeans with their alleged descent from the gods before the Danaans conquered them. Danaans were not given the same semi-divine or even respectable status by the bard. The same evidence can be deduced from other mythologies wherever the tribe of Dan invaded, even where there is little or no literature to support it. For some reason, researchers of the Merovingian bloodlines ignore the fact that the most powerful Illuminati bloodlines in the world (the Oldenburg families in particular) have been those of Danish descent, and that the Illuminati bloodlines from Franconia (e.g., the Rothschilds and the Warburgs) are actually of Jewish immigrant descent. (Perhaps they need to ignore this fact, as it undermines their whole paradigm.) The bloodline of the Merovingians was certainly married to the Franks, represented by Charlemagne, but how that is even relevant, considering that Charlemagne himself was of the Danish line, and that the Vikings conquered so many lands on so many occasions, leaving their DNA wherever they went, is lost on me. Nevertheless, I have chosen not to ignore the bits of credible evidence deduced by researchers concerned with the Merovingians while providing documentation further along in the book concerning the Danish families of the Hohenzollerns and Oldenburgs. Combined with the Jewish-Turkic-Nordic hybrid banking families, I consider this study to be vastly more important to the historical record. It must be remembered that Canaan was the world’s melting pot at that time, just as ethnically European nations are now, and that the majority of Canaanites were killed during their wars with the Israelites. There is, therefore, no conclusive evidence which proves whether Canaan (the man) was white or black. To use the common ancestry of the other original Hamitic peoples, he could have been anything in between, with a higher probability that he was black. We simply cannot know due to the extreme variation in the genes of Noah’s immediate offspring. (There were as many as 5000 separate genes per person on the Ark.)

76 I have called Solomon the founder of the Synagogue of Satan here because although the Levite priesthood was divided during David’s reign, it was Solomon’s corruption of the kingdom and the priesthood which made it permanent. The high priest Zadok apparently remained loyal to him and became the sole high priest during Solomon’s reign, the priest who anointed Solomon, and the first high priest of Solomon’s Temple. The position of the Zadokites is of extreme significance because they were the inheritors of the priesthood of Melchizedek which had clear preference over the Law of Moses and the Levite priesthood going all the way back to before Abraham’s time, and also of the ancient kingship of Salem (i.e., the whole of Canaan, though Bible scholars universally and erroneously think that the Kingdom of Salem and Jerusalem were the same). David, one of the Zadokites, also made Jerusalem his capital city, which meant that it was the political as well as spiritual center of Judah in direct opposition to Salem in the North (Israel). When Solomon pursued his idolatry, he forfeited his position as King of Israel and as an anointed representative of the order of Melchizedek, which David had held throughout his life. The kingdom became permanently divided, and the line of Zadok which had united the Levite priesthood with the ancient order of Melchizedek separated into a faction of Jews and a faction of priests, respectively, who were at eternally odds with each other. These two lines were merged again in the person of Yahshuah (technically, in his younger brother James the Just, as Yahshuah was hailed as King of Judaea, but never actually filled the function of High Priest, as James did, because he was killed prematurely), as indicated in the separate genealogies given in Matthew 1 and Luke 3, and by the antithetical (anti-Christian) family of priests (the Hasmoneans) which resumed the sacrificial duties after its exile in Babylon. (The traditions of the Talmud were handed down from the Babylonian period.) Matthias, one of these priests, was the patriarch of the Maccabee family of the 2nd century BC which revolted against the Seleucids and established the Hasmonean dynasty. This is the origin of the tripartite conflict of ideologies between the (conservative Solomonic) Sadducees, (Solomonic/Talmudic) Pharisees and the (Davidic) Zadokites (called Essenes in the larger sense, though there were several sects of Essenes) which had preceded the nation itself. Jews have equated the role of the mosheh with the establishment of an earthly kingdom ever since the 10th century BC, recognizing Solomon as their patriarch and believing they have a divine mandate to rule the world, while the Zadokites (and therefore Christians) remained loyal to their God and recognized Nathan as David’s true spiritual successor. (Christians have also taken the Jewish concept of the mosheh and made it particular to Yahshuah, and therefore attributed to him the messianic role invented by the opposing ideology. This has led to the doctrine of Athanasianism, or the belief in the inherent and exclusive divinity of Jesus Christ from birth, a concept originally intended to establish the rule of the Antichrist.) The priesthood of Zadok remained intact for many centuries until it was overthrown by the terrestrial power of the proto-Pharisee (probably Hellenic) Jewish nationalists. In light of information provided in the Dead Sea Texts, this event probably happened during the Maccabean Revolt, but it could have been several centuries earlier, during the reign of one of the apostate kings (most likely Zedekiah, c. 600 BC). In blatant opposition to the Pharisees and Sadduccees, Yahshuah is represented in the book of Hebrews as being the high priest of the order of Melchizedek. Christians, completely ignorant of this history (and virtually the entire Bible) and believing the false claim that Yahshuah was a Jew, typically believe that there was a gradual evolution of the priesthood into apostasy during the intertestamental period. There is no apparent explanation for why they believe this, as it is absurd to think that Yahshuah would have been driven out of the synagogues for simply reading the Tanakh (the Old Testament) if it was even an acceptable part of their literature, or that the Temple priests would have had him executed for preaching their own doctrines. (Traditionally, the Tanakh was accepted by the Pharisees as a secondary text, after the oral tradition which became the Talmud, and the Sadduccees only acknowledged the Pentateuch.) After accusing the Jews of Molekh worship (Acts 7:43), Stephen ended his speech to the Sanhedrin by saying, “Was there ever a prophet your fathers did not persecute? They even killed those who predicted the coming of the Righteous One. And now you have betrayed and murdered him,” (v. 52). Zadok means “the righteous one” in Hebrew. The life of Yahshuah as recorded in the Bible is the best source of information on the Nazarite customs and the religion of the pre-Abrahamic Zadokites, while the doctrines of contemporary Jews and Christians are the doctrines of Satanists which have their origins in Solomon’s apostasy.

77 Warren Doud, “Joel 3:1-8,” Grace Notes, http://www.realtime.net/~wdoud/joel/joel08.html.

“Joel Chapter 3:4-8 is a parenthetical insertion; in this parenthesis Joel marks a parallel between the fall of Jerusalem to the Romans in 70 AD, and the Philistine raid on the Jews in 845 BC, when the Philistines took many Jews captive and sold them to the Phoenicians, who in turn sold them as slaves to the Greeks. This event was within the memory of Joel’s generation and was therefore a very real example of that which Joel is stating in his parenthesis: God punishes anti-Semitism; the Jews themselves are to remember this and depend upon it. These Jewish slaves were sold to the Greeks by the Phoenicians because the Greeks of the ninth century BC were the most notorious homosexuals and pederasts in the world. And the demand for young people of both genders was extraordinary. ‘The cult of nudity, and deification of the male body, had made homosexuality quite fashionable in Greek society. Athletics and militarism were prime interests, and personalized with hedonistic humanism they encouraged a camaraderie conducive to spiritual and physical homophilia.’ This particular event is related in II Chronicles 21:16 and 17.”

78 “Carthage,” Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carthage.

79-80 David Padfield, “The Destruction of Tyre,” http://www.padfield.com/1994/tyre.html.

81 I. M. Oderberg, “Light from Ancient Egypt,” Theosophy Northwest, http://www.theosophy-nw.org/theosnw/reincar/re-imo2.htm.

82-83 Allen G. Roper, “Ancient Eugenics,” Plausible Futures, http://www.plausiblefutures.com/index.php?id=54552 (expired).

84 “Eugenics,” Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugenics.

85 “Hellfire Club,” Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hellfire_Club.

86 “Lunar Society,” Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lunar_Society.

87 “Arthur de Gobineau,” Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arthur_de_Gobineau.

I do not consider the Bayreuth Circle to be of as much importance to the development of anti-Semitism as evolutionary theory, but it is still worthy of mention considering that its members included men of notoriety who were primarily Illuminists. Incredibly, Theodor Herzl was one of Wagner’s associates. So was Houston Stewart Chamberlain, the author of The Foundations of the Nineteenth Century, an important treatise on Aryanism. Hitler called Chamberlain the “Prophet of the Third Reich.” His philosophy was heavily influenced by Schopenhauer and Nietzsche in particular. He held the middle position of a group of men and women who were in personal communication with and influenced by the most prominent Illuminists of their time, such as Goethe. Wagner was best known for being a composer, and his chief rivals were the Jewish composers Giacomo Meyerbeer and Felix Mendelssohn of the Itzig/Mendelssohn family, who happened to be students of Goethe’s close friend Karl Zelter. Not coincidentally, Goethe was also the oft-overlooked primary inspiration for Darwin, the advocates of whom have monumentally failed to recognize the connection between Atheism and Illuminism, as though Atheism is a separate and self-determined ideology. This point of view could hardly be any more foolish, as Darwin himself never diverged from the path his own grandfather had been on many years before he was born. However, it would be equally foolish to suppose that any Darwinist would even care, as theirs is a religion based as much on malicious treatment of the truth as it is ignorance and superstition. This is essentially why the Illuminati hate them.

88 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugenics.

89 For a complete overview of the Darwin/Wedgewood family see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darwin_%E2%80%94_Wedgwood_family.

90 Arthur Schopenhauer, Parerga and Paralipomena, Vol. II, Sect. 92, retrieved from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nordic_theory.

91 “German Society for Racial Hygiene,” Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_Society_for_Racial_Hygiene.

92-93 “Ernst Rüdin,” Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ernst_R%C3%BCdin.

At the time of this writing, I had not managed to access a membership list of this prestigious institution, and was only able to find the name of Friedrich Wilhelm in the registry, so without more information I did not know for sure what the connection between this school and the Hohenzollerns was, though I suspected there were many more Nazis in its alumni list. Now I do know the connection, but it actually extends through a large network of other, more important schools called the Round Square Conference, which I will be writing about at a later date. Other Swiss boarding schools wield even more influence than le Rosey, and given the list of its alumni, le Rosey still seems to be the first choice among Illuminists, though boarding schools in foreign countries have fallen out of style during the last half century or so. Other Swiss Illuminist boarding schools include the Institut auf dem Rosenberg in St. Gallen, and the International School of Geneva, a.k.a. Ecolint, which produced US Army five-star general Norman Schwarzkopf. Supposedly, many of the students of the Prussian Military Academy changed their names because Friedrich Wilhelm said he couldn’t read them; these names included a certain von Schwarzkoff, demonstrating that family ties in Illuminism outweigh political allegiances even in terms of the education of the generals who direct their wars.

94 The early 20th century eugenics movement in America led by Madison Grant is credited with inspiring the Nordicism or racial bigotry of the Nazis, but this is a post hoc argument probably designed to take the focus away from certain philosophical naturalists whose ideas regarding human evolution have gained acceptance by a large number of academic scientists. See endnote 87. There can be no doubt that the Eugenics Society in America and the one in Britain directly contributed to the Nordic sentiments of the Nazis, but eugenics was condemned after the war and the United States Army prosecuted leaders of the Third Reich for war crimes, albeit in mock fashion followed by quick releases. Today, eugenics is best represented by the Human Genome Project which has been successful due to an endowment by the Wellcome Trust, the same benefactor of the Down House (the Darwin family residence). The Wellcome Trust has turned the Down House into a museum to commemorate the place where Charles Darwin penned his famous book. As if it needs saying, this clearly shows a conflict of interests (that is, a conspiracy).

95-97 Steve Quayle, “Middle East Giants” p. 7, http://www.stevequayle.com/index.php?s=331.

 

98 “Arran (Azerbaijan),” Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arran_(Azerbaijan).

This page has expired, but I have kept it here in order to show that the first referent is “Arran (Caucasus), historical region (also known as Caucasian Albania),” indicating that Arran and Albania are indeed two interchangeable names for the same land in antiquity.

99 “House of Alpin,” Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/House_of_Alpin.

The island between Ulster in Ireland and the Inner Hebrides in Scotland which served as the waypoint for the movement of the Dál Riata also happens to be named Arran.

100 Most of the ancient traditions actually place the landing at Mt. Hermon between modern Lebanon and Syria. I have chosen to use the Luciferian tradition after correspondence with a few Luciferians who were completely convinced that their coordinates were accurate. The reason I have gone by this, despite the discrepancy, is for the simple fact that the coordinates were tailored by Luciferians in the 17th century in order that there would be 33 degrees between Paris and the spot in question. It wasn’t until 1884 that this distance was measured accurately in standard usage (hence the Greenwich Mean). Incidentally, the 33rd latitude and Parisian longitude actually do meet closer to Gaza than to Mt. Hermon. It seems, therefore, that the Luciferians have based their coordinates Baalbek, or on the Sidon-Cydonia (Mars) connection. It is possible that the landing(s) happened in more than one place, or that either Mt. Hermon or the area around Gaza had some other special significance. In fact, the official story of the Romans building Baalbek would make it the largest religious complex they ever built. However, Mt. Hermon still seems the most likely place for the landing, as the city of Sidon is exactly 33.33 nautical miles from the Equator. (So is Mt. Hermon, but with some variability, as it covers a large region.) Mt. Hermon is also the same distance in nautical miles from the zero meridian, which certainly indicates what the Luciferians in Paris were attempting to reconcile. It would seem then that Sidon—the parent city of Tyre (and Gaza) built by the firstborn of Canaan—was actually the capital or cultural center of the nefilim or gibborim at one time. In other words, it was either built on ancient ruins or placed at those coordinates intentionally in the same manner that the nefilim citadels of Sumer were reconstructed. At the very least, this explains why Sidon inherited the gibborim legacy more than any other city. See David Flynn’s 2005 revelation concerning the relationship between the coordinates of Mt. Hermon and Roswell, New Mexico, which proves beyond a reasonable doubt that the ancient Luciferian conspiracy is still very much in effect: http://www.ahrimangate.com/flynn.htm.

101-103 The Encyclopedia Mythica claims the name of the Tuatha comes from the Celtic mother-goddess Danu. I disagree based on the notion that mythological traditions develop from true historical details, not vice-versa, but Danu’s Welsh name is Don. She is wife to Beli, the lord of the gods, which suggests that both these names are possibly derivatives of the ancient Luciferian tradition (Dan and Bel), evolved over time, without any significant entropy. See endnotes 95-97 for details regarding the preservation of the ancient languages of the Gomerites. See http://watch.pair.com/dan.html for a detailed article about the dispersion of the tribe of Dan. Unfortunately, the webmaster of Watch Unto Prayer has been duped and heavily influenced by the Merovingian mythos created by Pierre Plantard, but much of the information on the website is still both useful and historically accurate.

104 Jeremiah 1:10

105-106 “Jeremiah and Tea Tephi,” http://www.asis.com/~stag/jerrytea.html.

The “prophet” Jah claims to have recovered Tea Tephi’s autobiography and as of 2006 was looking for a publisher; http://jahtruth.co.uk/tephi.htm. Had I known about Jah’s publications (flawed though they may be) earlier, I would have incorporated some of them into my research. As it is, they have been done independently of each other, at least as far as I know. Also, as a disclaimer, Jah is a liar and has no inherent credibility as far as I am concerned, as virtually all of his assertions apart from the context of this book are sheer nonsense. He thinks he is Jesus Christ (among others) and has written to the British monarchy insisting that he be made king of the world while simultaneously encouraging others to murder members of the Order of the Illuminati. Readers are encouraged to avoid anything having to do with “Jah’s” line of research and instead direct themselves to John Dunham-Massey’s Tamar Tephi, or the Maid of Destiny: The Great Romance of the Royal House of Britain, The Covenant Publishing Co., London.